P8. Humidification and nasal high flow (NHF) therapy
A randomised trial by Rea et al (2010) found that NHF for up to 2 hours daily reduced annual exacerbation days and days to first exacerbation but not hospital admission compared with usual care in a group of 108 patients, with COPD/ bronchiectasis. Quality of life and lung function also improved. No sham treatment was given.
In a small study crossover by Nagata et al (2018), use of nocturnal HFNC in addition to LTOT also demonstrated significant benefit in quality of life (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire COPD (SGRQ-C)) score improved by 7.8 points; (95% CI 3.7-11.9; p<0.01) and measured PCO2 (-4.1, 95% CI -6.5 to -1.7), other studies have not demonstrated benefits in patient-related outcomes. In a 12-month multi-centre study of just over 100 patients with severe COPD and resting hypercapnia on LTOT in Japan by Nagata (2022), reductions were found in annual moderate to severe exacerbation rates and days to first exacerbation in the group receiving high flow nasal oxygen in addition to long term oxygen therapy, but there were no changes in breathlessness scores, for example, between the groups, over the duration of the study. No sham treatment was given in these studies by Rea and Nagata, and in the 2022 Nagata study, hospitalisation rate was not reported. The arm without the high flow nasal canula intervention had significantly higher combined moderate and severe exacerbations, which was the primary outcome of interest, by an adjusted odds ratio of 2.85 (95% CI 1.48-5.47). Hospital admissions were classed as severe exacerbations but were not significantly reduced (Nagata 2022) [evidence level II].
In a 12-month study by Storgaard et al (2018), 200 Danish patients with stable hypoxaemic COPD who had commenced long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) within the preceding 3 months were randomised to LTOT alone or LTOT plus high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at 20 litres/minute with oxygen flow unchanged (mean 1.75 (0.8) L) for at least 6 hours per day. 67 patients in the HFNC group completed the trial and 71 in LTOT group. Analysis was by intention to treat. Exacerbation rate was decreased in the HFNC group but not hospitalisations.
The role of long-term domiciliary HFNC is as yet still unclear. Prospective randomised controlled trials in the appropriate COPD patient population with meaningful clinical endpoints are required before long-term domiciliary NHF can be recommended.
< Prev Next >